Solutions Architect vs IT Auditor: Which Pays More?
Side-by-side salary comparison by city, experience level, and career growth outlook. Data reflects current market rates.
Solutions Architect
Design technical solutions to meet customer business requirements.
IT Auditor
Assess IT systems and controls to identify risks and ensure regulatory compliance.
IT Auditor earns more on average — the national median is $12,600/year (11%) higher than a Solutions Architect. However, salaries vary significantly by city, employer, and experience level — see the city-by-city breakdown below.
Solutions Architect vs IT Auditor — Salary by City
National median figures in USD across top cities.
| City | Solutions Architect | IT Auditor | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| San Francisco, CA | $166,946 | $191,207 | Solutions $24,261 |
| New York, NY | $142,757 | $159,465 | Solutions $16,708 |
| Seattle, WA | $165,593 | $186,599 | Solutions $21,006 |
| Austin, TX | $130,504 | $140,102 | Solutions $9,598 |
| Chicago, IL | $128,220 | $140,966 | Solutions $12,746 |
| Boston, MA | $149,219 | $173,381 | Solutions $24,162 |
| London, UK | £88,896 | £99,246 | Solutions $10,350 |
| Toronto, Canada | CA$151,769 | CA$172,237 | Solutions $20,468 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Does a Solutions Architect or IT Auditor earn more?+
A IT Auditor earns more on average. The national median salary for a Solutions Architect is $116,580/year, compared to $129,180/year for a IT Auditor — a difference of $12,600 (11%).
Which has better career growth — Solutions Architect or IT Auditor?+
Solutions Architect roles are growing at 24% YoY while IT Auditor demand is growing at 14% YoY. Solutions Architect has stronger near-term demand growth.
Can you switch from Solutions Architect to IT Auditor?+
Yes. Many professionals transition between these roles, especially since both are in the same category. Shared skills include: analytical thinking, communication, and industry knowledge.
Which is harder to automate — Solutions Architect or IT Auditor?+
Solutions Architect has a lower AI automation risk (30% vs 52%). Based on Oxford Martin School and McKinsey 2023 analysis.