Insurance Underwriter vs ESG Analyst: Which Pays More?
Side-by-side salary comparison by city, experience level, and career growth outlook. Data reflects current market rates.
Insurance Underwriter
Evaluate insurance applications and set policy terms and premiums.
ESG Analyst
Assess environmental, social, and governance factors in investment decisions.
ESG Analyst earns more on average โ the national median is $21,370/year (26%) higher than a Insurance Underwriter. However, salaries vary significantly by city, employer, and experience level โ see the city-by-city breakdown below.
Insurance Underwriter vs ESG Analyst โ Salary by City
National median figures in USD across top cities.
| City | Insurance Underwriter | ESG Analyst | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| San Francisco, CA | $116,321 | $150,970 | Insurance $34,649 |
| New York, NY | $97,453 | $128,930 | Insurance $31,477 |
| Seattle, WA | $112,876 | $150,261 | Insurance $37,385 |
| Austin, TX | $91,022 | $111,571 | Insurance $20,549 |
| Chicago, IL | $86,961 | $112,333 | Insurance $25,372 |
| Boston, MA | $107,567 | $134,464 | Insurance $26,897 |
| London, UK | ยฃ63,807 | ยฃ81,801 | Insurance $17,994 |
| Toronto, Canada | CA$109,558 | CA$133,398 | Insurance $23,840 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Does a Insurance Underwriter or ESG Analyst earn more?+
A ESG Analyst earns more on average. The national median salary for a Insurance Underwriter is $81,370/year, compared to $102,740/year for a ESG Analyst โ a difference of $21,370 (26%).
Which has better career growth โ Insurance Underwriter or ESG Analyst?+
Insurance Underwriter roles are growing at 5% YoY while ESG Analyst demand is growing at 35% YoY. ESG Analyst has stronger near-term demand growth.
Can you switch from Insurance Underwriter to ESG Analyst?+
Yes. Many professionals transition between these roles, especially since both are in the same category. Shared skills include: analytical thinking, communication, and industry knowledge.
Which is harder to automate โ Insurance Underwriter or ESG Analyst?+
ESG Analyst has a lower AI automation risk (35% vs 82%). Based on Oxford Martin School and McKinsey 2023 analysis.